Commentary, Health Economics

LONG-FORM COMMENTARY: Navigating Healthcare Reform: Making the Case for Global Health Budgets

Richa Upadhyay, Stanford University -- One in four Americans report that they or a family member struggles to afford healthcare. The American healthcare industry is facing a critical need to control costs and incentivize high-quality care. Empty hospitals and shorter stays should be seen as a sign of efficient healthcare provision and improved population health rather than a revenue red flag. States must align financial and public health incentives through global budgeting, a form of value-based care, to tie hospital payments to health outcomes. 

Commentary, Health Economics

COMMENTARY: Incentivizing Innovation in Pharmaceuticals: How to Encourage Research and Development Without Harming Consumer Welfare

Sophia Barthel, Emory University -- While developing new drugs is crucial for public health, there is a tension between incentivizing innovation (i.e., profit for pharmaceutical companies) and ensuring life-saving drugs are affordable. Pharmaceutical price gouging has drawn the public’s ire in recent years. Moreover, US spending on prescription drugs increased more than tenfold between 1980 and 2018, due in large part to the fact that drug prices in the US are 2.3 times higher than those present in other OECD countries on average. Thus, it is imperative that policymakers balance the incentive for pharmaceutical companies to invent new drugs with ensuring those drugs are affordable and accessible.

Commentary, Health Economics

COMMENTARY: The American Nursing Shortage: An Economic Sickness with a Cure

Kyle Feinstein, Stanford University -- At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, America fell ill to a critical shortage of nurses. At its core, the shortage was an economic disease, and it was spreading. Within months, the global shortage of nurses, estimated at 5.9 million nurses, climbed to a staggering 13 million. The scarcity caused nurses to be deployed out of their specialty. Hospitals were pushed to invest copious funds into contract nurses to alleviate the workload. High turnover rates spawned discontinuity issues, giving rise to safety concerns. This cascade of challenges forced hospitals to limit services and jeopardized the most central responsibility of healthcare providers: patient outcomes.

Commentary, Health Economics

LONG-FORM COMMENTARY: Saving the Lungs of 1.4 Billion: India and the Need for Air Pollution Control

Raina Talwar Bhatia, Stanford University -- Air pollution has become one of the most pressing issues of our time, both from a health and economic perspective. According to the WHO, air pollution is responsible for approximately seven million deaths globally. Nine out of ten humans currently breathe ‘polluted air’ (as per WHO guidelines), with inhabitants of low and middle-income countries feeling the greatest consequences. Although the health effects of air pollution are well-documented, much less attention is given to its economic consequences. The total global cost of air pollution in 2015 was $330 billion and is expected to rise to $3.3 trillion by 2060 based on the current trajectory. Alongside the healthcare costs, air pollution decreases agricultural productivity, increases absenteeism and reduces productivity in the workplace, and creates greater resident interest in emigration and immigration. While all low and middle-income countries are disproportionately impacted by air pollution, none draw the concern and attention of the international community and health experts like India.

Health Economics

The Effect of Primary Care Provider Supply on Downstream Emergency Department Visits for Pediatric Asthma in California

Jashdeep Dhillon, University of California, Berkeley -- California is facing a primary care workforce shortage. Although this has been studied at the state level, it is important to understand the downstream health implications: how will this affect the management of chronic illnesses or how will this affect access to primary care? Due to the significance of investing in childhood health, I exploit different healthcare access features (i.e. the number of primary care physicians) across California’s counties with a variety of socioeconomic variables to investigate the effect of the supply of primary care providers on emergency department visits for pediatric asthma.

Announcements, Health Economics, Politics, Uncategorized

Our Winter 2023 Issue

On behalf of the Stanford Economic Review Editorial Board, I am pleased to present the eleventh volume, winter issue, of Stanford University’s undergraduate economics journal. Building on our momentum from last year, our publication has continued expanding its global reach over the course of the 2022-2023 academic year. As our readership climbs to new heights,… Continue reading Our Winter 2023 Issue

Commentary, Health Economics

COMMENTARY: That Time a South American Country Fought Big Tobacco—and Won

VinhHuy Le, Stanford University -- In 2010, the world’s largest tobacco conglomerate descended on an international courtroom ready to fight. Philip Morris International, the company behind cigarette brands like Malboro and Chesterfield, sued the South American country of Uruguay for $25 million. But why pick on a country whose entire GDP at the time was half the size of Philip Morris’ net worth?

Commentary, Health Economics

COMMENTARY: Bigger Is Not Always Better: The True Impact of Hospital Mergers

Richa Upadhyay, Stanford University -- Most people can name the nation’s most prominent health systems such as Kaiser Permanente, Mayo Clinic, and Trinity Health. Hospital mergers and acquisitions continue to make the “household names” of healthcare stronger, but such consolidation often comes at the expense of consumers. More often than not, hospital acquisitions fail to improve health outcomes while raising costs for patients and payers due to decreased competition.

Health Economics

Labor Market Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: State Policy, Compliance, and Social Behavior

Julian W. Klingen, Oberlin College -- The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in late February 2020 in the United States constituted an unprecedented economic shock, in addition to the tragic loss of life, and sparked a rapidly growing literature on the economic implications. Exploiting county-level data in the U.S. from January - August 2020, this paper examines labor market performance in structurally similar counties situated along state borders that were exposed to varying degrees of nonpharmaceutical interventions.